Individual Preliminary Rankings

Please complete the yellow highlighted cells and email to Tara by midday 20 October 2022 Committee members will have an opportunity to provide a rationale at the meeting on 25 October 2022, and reconsider these rankings before the final meeting

School
Project Title
Nominated Program
Works Commence
Works Complete
CTC
Total Project Cost
School Contribution
Grant Requested
K-12 Enrolments
XYZ 1
XYZ 2
XYZ 3
XYZ 4
XYZ 5
XYZ 6
Preschool Capacity
XYZ 1
XYZ 2
XYZ 3
XYZ 4
XYZ 5
XYZ 6

Rankings

Please distribute rankings across rows from 1 to 6 with 1 being the lowest priority rank and 6 the highest priority.
NB: Please do not repeat a number
For criteria where it is difficult to differentiate the rank, consider:
1. How great is the need for the project or
2. How well would this project meet this need

Assessment Criteria
Assessment Criteria
School 1
School 2
School 3
School 4
School 5
School 6
 
20% - Relative educational disadvantage
Relative educational disadvantage of the student population of the school as measured by CTC Scores:- CTC 85-105 Score 3 (high disadvantage)
- CTC 106-111 Score 2 (medium disadvantage)
- CTC 112-125 Score 1 (low disadvantage)

Cross reference:
Services Agreement section 2.7.1d
Project Assessment Report section 4
25% - Project increases enrolment capacity Cross reference:Services Agreement section 2.7.1c
Project Assessment Report section 8
25% - Best value for money Project provides best value for money and contributes to maximisation of funding outcomes

Cross reference:
Services Agreement section 2.7.1e
Project Assessment Report section 12(b) & 12(c)
5% - Readiness of the school to commence construction Readiness of the school to commence construction (project proposal provides confidence in school's project planning process and ability to meet proposed timelines)

Cross reference:
Services Agreement section 2.7.1f
Project Assessment Report section 10
25% - Project improves the amenity Project improves the amenity of the non-government school in respect of compliance of facilities with government requirements or supporting advances in school pedagogy

Cross reference:
Services Agreement section 2.7.1g
Project Assessment Report section 9